Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A41, getting an 87.1 score against 81.7. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A41, but it's somewhat heavier. The LG Velvet counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density. LG Velvet has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same sensor size, the same resolution back camera and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low light environments.
LG Velvet counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A41, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG Velvet has longer battery duration than Galaxy A41, because it has a 23 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.