Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the LG Velvet's global score of 87.1. Samsung Galaxy A52's design is newer than the LG Velvet's, although it is a little thicker and just a bit heavier. The LG Velvet has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 and LG Velvet both feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy A52 has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A52 captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The LG Velvet features a better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.