Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is slightly better than LG Velvet's 87.1 general score. Although the Galaxy A52 5G is newer than the LG Velvet, it's just a bit heavier and just a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a screen that is very similar to the display in LG Velvet, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density.
The LG Velvet counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. LG Velvet features a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger sensor. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.