Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is a bit better than LG Velvet's 87.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is newer, but a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than the LG Velvet. The Samsung Galaxy A52s and LG Velvet count with quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG Velvet features a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A52s has a processor that's very similar to LG Velvet's CPU, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
The Galaxy A52s takes clearer photos and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also has a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a bigger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A52s features a bit better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.