Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is better than Galaxy A6's 75.8 score. The LG Velvet body is newer, but a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A6. The LG Velvet counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2460, a higher screen pixel density and a larger display.
LG Velvet has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM. The LG Velvet counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG Velvet features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The LG Velvet captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a lot more MP camera and a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
Although LG Velvet is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.