Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2020-05-15 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), but it's a little bit lighter. LG Velvet counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution.
LG Velvet counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has 3 GB more RAM. LG Velvet has a way better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot more MP back facing camera, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better images in low light environments.
The LG Velvet has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. LG Velvet counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.