Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than Samsung Galaxy A70, with an 87.1 score against 76.9. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's just a little lighter. LG Velvet counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a little bigger screen, a little higher pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
LG Velvet features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. LG Velvet counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. LG Velvet takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a way larger sensor.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG Velvet is also cheap compared to the other phone, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.