Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | -- |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G's 80.5 general score. The LG Velvet design is just a little bit lighter but a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. LG Velvet counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A73 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy A73 5G features a bit sharper display than LG Velvet, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little lower screen pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. LG Velvet counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A73 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G features superior battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity. The LG Velvet captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A73 5G, although it has a much lower resolution camera in the back, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.