Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-15 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than Galaxy C5, getting a score of 87.1 against 76.4. LG Velvet's construction is way newer, but notably heavier and thicker than the Galaxy C5. LG Velvet features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C5, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The LG Velvet counts with a way bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy C5, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The LG Velvet counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 4300mAh battery size. LG Velvet counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy C5, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light images, a much more megapixels camera and a much better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.