Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, blue and white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | PLS |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M12's 80 overall score. Although LG Velvet is older than Samsung Galaxy M12, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. LG Velvet has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet features a sharper screen than Galaxy M12, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a greater pixel quantity in each inch of display and a little bit larger display. LG Velvet has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M12, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy M12 has a very superior battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 40 percent bigger battery size. The LG Velvet counts with a better camera than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.