Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-07-01 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M13's 81.1 global score. Despite of the fact that the LG Velvet is much older than the Samsung Galaxy M13, it's body is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy M13 counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2408 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher amount of pixels in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy M13 has a little faster processing unit than LG Velvet, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. LG Velvet features a much greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy M13 counts with longer battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. LG Velvet captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M13, although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.