Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Samsung Galaxy M20, getting an 87.1 score against 78.9. The LG Velvet body is newer, a little lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy M20. LG Velvet has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
LG Velvet counts with much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy M20 features better battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 16% bigger battery size. LG Velvet captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments, a way bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a much better 48 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.