Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Blue, Brown and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy M33's global score of 86.3. LG Velvet's design is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Galaxy M33. Samsung Galaxy M33's processing unit is just as good as LG Velvet's processor, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM.
Galaxy M33 and LG Velvet have extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy M33 has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel quantity per inch in the display. The LG Velvet has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M33, although it has a less megapixels back-facing camera, they both have the same aperture.
LG Velvet features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M33, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M33 counts with better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.