Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is slightly better than LG Velvet's global score of 87.1. The Galaxy M51 is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone than LG Velvet. LG Velvet has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
The LG Velvet counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a just a bit better pixel number per inch in the display and a little higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. LG Velvet has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a superior battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. Galaxy M51 features a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M51 also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.