Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2020-05-15 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's overall score of 80.4. LG Velvet's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a little higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The LG Velvet features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM. The LG Velvet features a better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a bigger camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a much more megapixels back camera.
LG Velvet has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG Velvet features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.