Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, getting an 87.1 score against 86.2. Even when the LG Velvet and the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite were only released with a few months difference, the LG Velvet is a little thinner and just a little lighter. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better CPU than LG Velvet. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite and LG Velvet both have extremely similar displays, although the Galaxy Note10 Lite has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit smaller display and a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch of screen. LG Velvet features more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.