Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's overall score of 77.7. LG Velvet is a a lot newer and a little bit thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, although it is also a little heavier. LG Velvet counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of display, a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
LG Velvet counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The LG Velvet shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture for better images in low light situations.
The LG Velvet features better battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.