Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2020-05-15 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Galaxy Note4, having a general score of 87.1 against 77.6. The LG Velvet design is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy Note4. Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels density.
LG Velvet features a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM. LG Velvet has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a much higher resolution camera in the back, a larger camera aperture and a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The LG Velvet counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.