Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is slightly better than the LG Velvet's 87.1 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 construction has the same thickness than the LG Velvet, but it's somewhat lighter. The Galaxy S10 features just a bit better hardware performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. The LG Velvet has a better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The LG Velvet counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features superior battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a bit more expensive than LG Velvet, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.