Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is slightly better than the LG Velvet, getting a overall score of 89.7 against 87.1. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, it must be told that it is also a just a little bit thicker and a little heavier phone. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a little faster CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG Velvet and the Galaxy S10 Lite have similar screens, although the Galaxy S10 Lite has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, a quite inferior number of pixels per inch of screen and a little smaller screen. The Galaxy S10 Lite features just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same camera sensor size and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster video frame rates.
The LG Velvet has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10 Lite has just a little better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 5% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs a little more than LG Velvet, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.