Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is slightly better than Galaxy S10e, getting a global score of 87.1 against 86.3. The LG Velvet is a heavier cellphone than the Galaxy S10e, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little better performance than LG Velvet. They have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixel density. LG Velvet features a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
LG Velvet features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG Velvet is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.