Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is a bit better than the LG Velvet, having a general score of 94.8 against 87.1. Samsung Galaxy S20's construction has the same thickness than the LG Velvet, but it is a little lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has just a bit better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a higher number of pixels per screen inch. LG Velvet takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with faster video frame rate and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG Velvet features a better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Velvet. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG Velvet, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.