Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is slightly better than LG Velvet, getting a global score of 90.8 against 87.1. Galaxy S20 FE's body is a bit thicker and just a little heavier than LG Velvet. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Velvet. They have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Galaxy S20 FE has a little more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater number of pixels per inch in the display.
LG Velvet counts with a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5% more battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Velvet. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG Velvet, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.