Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the Samsung Galaxy S23, getting an 87.1 score against 77.9. LG Velvet has a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S23, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG Velvet counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S23, because although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
LG Velvet features a superior camera than Galaxy S23, although it has a lot smaller sensor taking way worse quality pictures and videos and a back camera with lesser MP, they both have a same size aperture. The LG Velvet counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S23, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S23, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.