Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's 76 general score. LG Velvet's design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, but it is somewhat lighter. The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a sharper display than LG Velvet, although it has a little less pixels per display inch, a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a way bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with 7 more processing cores.
LG Velvet shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a back camera with a lower resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture. The Galaxy S24 FE has just a bit better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
LG Velvet is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.