Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25's overall score of 82.6. LG Velvet counts with a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
The LG Velvet has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a more mega pixels back camera and a way higher video resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG Velvet is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.