Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 overall score. LG Velvet is an a lot older cellphone than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it's much lighter and a lot thinner anyway. LG Velvet features a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
LG Velvet counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a quite bigger display. LG Velvet has more memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 6% greater battery size. LG Velvet features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a worse 48 MP resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.