Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. The LG Velvet is a lighter and notably thinner cellphone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both were released with only 1 months difference. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixels density.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better processing power than LG Velvet, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG Velvet counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a way bigger back camera sensor and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
LG Velvet has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5% more battery size.
The LG Velvet not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.