Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| 2020-05-15 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Xperia XZs's global score of 77.2. The LG Velvet construction is newer and a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Xperia XZs. The LG Velvet features a little faster processor than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Sony Xperia XZs features a display that's just as good as the screen in LG Velvet, because although the Sony Xperia XZs has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density. LG Velvet has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia XZs, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xperia XZs features a superior camera than LG Velvet, although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos, a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a much lower resolution. The LG Velvet has a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG Velvet is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.