Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's 82.2 general score. LG Velvet is a newer cellphone, and it's also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T. LG Velvet has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bit sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Mi 9T takes just a bit better pictures and videos than LG Velvet. Both of them have a same resolution back camera, the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
LG Velvet counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.