Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, getting an 87.1 score against 83.8. LG Velvet is a extremely newer phone, and it is also just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a display that is very similar to the LG Velvet one, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density.
The LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM memory.
LG Velvet counts with improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. LG Velvet features a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG Velvet is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.