Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than LG Velvet's 87.1 overall score. Although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a better device than the LG Velvet, it must be noted that it's also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Velvet. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better display than LG Velvet, although it has a little bit smaller display, a quite worse display density and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior camera than LG Velvet, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a much better video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG Velvet features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.