Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F4 is just a bit better than the LG Velvet, with a global score of 87.5 against 87.1. Although the Xiaomi Poco F4 is just a little heavier than the LG Velvet, it's just a bit thinner and much newer. The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a bit more powerful processor than LG Velvet. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a better display than LG Velvet, although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, a little bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite smaller screen. The Xiaomi Poco F4 features just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also has a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
LG Velvet features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F4, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F4 features just a bit better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.