Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's general score of 79.5. The LG Velvet is an older device than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. LG Velvet has a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. The LG Velvet has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with improved battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 20% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.