Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, with an 87.1 score against 79.3. Even when the LG Velvet and the Xiaomi Poco X2 were released only a few months apart, the LG Velvet is somewhat lighter and thinner. The LG Velvet counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco X2. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cores.
The LG Velvet features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a bit more pixels per display inch, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a quite bigger screen. Xiaomi Poco X2 has just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG Velvet has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X2 has a bit superior battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 5 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.