Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with an 87.1 score against 81.6. LG Velvet is a lighter and somewhat thinner device than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a processing unit that is very similar to the LG Velvet one, they have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit better display than LG Velvet, although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite smaller screen. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger back camera sensor.
LG Velvet counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.