Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 overall score. The LG Velvet body is a little thinner and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, although it was released just 10 months before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a better display than LG Velvet, although it has a little worse display density, a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a CPU that is very similar to the CPU in LG Velvet, both have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. LG Velvet counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit better camera than LG Velvet, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG Velvet is also a bit cheaper, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.