Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's score of 76.6. The LG Velvet is a somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, although both were only released 0 months apart. LG Velvet has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bigger screen.
LG Velvet has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size sensor, the same resolution back camera and a same size aperture, the LG Velvet also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 17 percent greater battery capacity.
LG Velvet not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.