Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 80.2. The LG Velvet design has the same thickness than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it is just a little bit heavier. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has just a little better processing power than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
LG Velvet and ZTE Axon 10 Pro both feature incredibly similar displays, because although the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG Velvet, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more internal memory capacity.
LG Velvet counts with just a bit longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery size. LG Velvet shoots slightly better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and video in low light environments and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, they both have the same video definition and a same resolution back facing camera.
LG Velvet is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.