Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with a general score of 87.1 against 76.6. The LG Velvet is a a little bit heavier phone than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but both have the same thickness. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Velvet. Both have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM.
LG Velvet and ZTE Axon 10s Pro both count with incredibly similar screens, because although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixel density. The LG Velvet features a much better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and a 48 MP back camera, the LG Velvet also counts with a way higher video quality.
The LG Velvet has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has just a little bit longer battery performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.