Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the ZTE Axon 11, having an 87.1 score against 76. The LG Velvet design has the same thickness than the ZTE Axon 11, but it's a little heavier. The ZTE Axon 11's processor is just as good as the LG Velvet one, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
LG Velvet and ZTE Axon 11 count with similar screens, because although the ZTE Axon 11 has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density. The ZTE Axon 11 features a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than LG Velvet, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the ZTE Axon 11 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB.
The LG Velvet has a bit superior battery life than ZTE Axon 11, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. LG Velvet captures better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a way lower resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.