Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than ZTE Axon 20, having an 87.1 score against 77.8. The LG Velvet construction has the same thickness than ZTE Axon 20, but it is just a little lighter. The ZTE Axon 20 features a bit better processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 20 also has more RAM.
The LG Velvet counts with a bit sharper display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2460 resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a little greater pixels number per screen inch. The ZTE Axon 20 counts with just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with faster video frame rates, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
LG Velvet has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a little longer battery performance than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 2 percent larger battery size.
LG Velvet is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.