Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.55 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is way better than the LG X venture's 71.7 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than the LG X venture's, although it is heavier. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version while LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a brighter display than LG X venture, because although it has a quite lower pixels amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than LG X venture, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory.
LG X venture counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than LG X venture, because it has a much bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments, a much better resolution camera in the back and a much higher video definition.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit longer battery life than LG X venture, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.