Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is better than the LG X venture, getting an 80 score against 71.7. The Motorola One Zoom construction is incredibly newer and a bit thinner than the LG X venture's, although it's also somewhat heavier. The Motorola One Zoom features a bit faster processing unit than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Zoom and LG X venture both have quite similar screens, because although the Motorola One Zoom has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. LG X venture features a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG X venture features a bit better battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity. Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior camera than LG X venture, because it has a much bigger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG X venture. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG X venture, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.