Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than the LG X venture, with an 83.8 score against 71.7. Galaxy A50's body is newer, just a little lighter and thinner than LG X venture. The Galaxy A50 features a bit sharper display than LG X venture, because although it has a quite inferior pixels quantity in each inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Galaxy A50 has a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than LG X venture, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better processing power than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A50 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better camera than LG X venture, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a way larger diafragm aperture and a way better 25 mega-pixels resolution camera. LG X venture has a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 4100mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Galaxy A50 costs a lot more money than the LG X venture, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.