Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is way better than the LG X venture, having an 89 score against 71.7. The Galaxy Note10 construction is newer and somewhat thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the LG X venture. Galaxy Note10 counts with a superior processor than LG X venture, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better looking display than LG X venture, because although it has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bigger display. Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than LG X venture, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note10 takes better photographs and videos than LG X venture, because although it has a much worse 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a way bigger aperture and a much better (4K) video quality. LG X venture counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG X venture. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG X venture, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.