Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 110.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is way better than the LG X venture's overall score of 71.7. Galaxy Z Flip is a newer and incredibly thinner device than LG X venture, but it's also a little heavier. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a greater processing power than LG X venture, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper screen than LG X venture, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a bigger screen and a little better display pixel density.
Galaxy Z Flip features a superior camera than LG X venture, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than LG X venture, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
LG X venture features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG X venture. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG X venture, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.