Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 110.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is way better than the LG X venture's overall score of 71.7. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a a lot newer and extremely thinner phone than the LG X venture, although it is also just a little bit heavier. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little sharper screen than LG X venture, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a little greater pixels density and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior processor than LG X venture, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than LG X venture, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. LG X venture features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4100mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better camera than LG X venture, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG X venture. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG X venture, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.