Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 110.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than LG X venture's 71.7 general score. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is notably newer and notably thinner than LG X venture's, although it is incredibly heavier.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a faster processor than LG X venture, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little sharper display than LG X venture, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a much bigger display and a higher 1768 x 2208px resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures much clearer videos and photos than LG X venture, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way better video definition and a larger camera aperture for better low light photography. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG X venture, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better battery performance than LG X venture, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG X venture. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG X venture, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.