Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| CSTN | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6571 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-400 (Dual-Core 500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.61 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 373 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is way better than the Micromax Bolt A065, getting an 83.7 score against 45.2. These phones include Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Micromax Bolt A065 has Android 4.4.2. LG V50 ThinQ has a better display than Micromax Bolt A065, because it has a way bigger display, a way better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a quite superior performance than Micromax Bolt A065, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and more cores. The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better camera than Micromax Bolt A065, because it has a way better resolution camera and a lot higher video resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Micromax Bolt A065, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a way better battery duration than Micromax Bolt A065, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Micromax Bolt A065.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.